Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1303

reference
644-tree-1
name
1303
tree-preservation-order

undefined

644-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046088 50.866284)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046031 50.866278,-1.046034 50.866289,-1.046042 50.866300,-1.046054 50.866308,-1.046070 50.866313,-1.046087 50.866315,-1.046105 50.866313,-1.046121 50.866308,-1.046134 50.866300,-1.046142 50.866290,-1.046145 50.866279,-1.046142 50.866268,-1.046134 50.866258,-1.046122 50.866250,-1.046106 50.866245,-1.046089 50.866243,-1.046071 50.866244,-1.046055 50.866249,-1.046042 50.866257,-1.046034 50.866267,-1.046031 50.866278)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL